تأثیر ظرفیت جذب و انعطاف‌پذیری راهبردی بر نوآوری مدل‌ کسب‌وکارهای کوچک و متوسط در زمان همه‌گیری بیماری کروناویروس

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام رضا (ع)، مشهد، ایران

2 استادیار، دانشگاه بین المللی امام رضا(ع)، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

  شیوع بیماری همه‌گیر کروناویروس تأثیر بارزی بر عملکرد کسب‌وکارهای کوچک و متوسط گذاشته است که در فرآیند رشد و توسعه اقتصادی و اجتماعی کشورها اهمیت ویژه‌ای دارند. لذا ضرورت دارد که مدیران کسب‌وکارها نسبت به ایجاد نوآوری در مدل کسب‌وکار خود در ایجاد ارزش به منظور بقا و رشد کسب‌وکار خود اقدام نمایند. هدف پژوهش بررسی تأثیر ظرفیت جذب و انعطاف‌پذیری راهبردی بر نوآوری مدل‌ کسب‌وکارهای کوچک و متوسط در طول بیماری همه‌گیری کروناویروس است. پژوهش از حیث هدف، کاربردی و از حیث روش، از نوع توصیفی ـ همبستگی محسوب می‌شود. جامعه آماری شامل کسب‌وکارهای کوچک و متوسط شهر مشهد است. حجم نمونه پژوهش 297 شرکت است که پرسشنامه استاندارد به منظور پاسخگویی برای مدیران ارشد این شرکت‌ها ارسال گردید. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها و آزمون فرضیه‌های پژوهش به کمک  نرم‌افزار اسمارت‌پی‌ال‌اس و همچنین روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد حداقل مربعات جرئی انجام شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که ظرفیت جذب بالقوه به طور مستقیم بر ظرفیت جذب تحقق‌یافته و همچنین نوآوری مدل کسب‌وکار و انعطاف‌پذیری راهبردی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. امّا تأثیر انعطاف‌پذیری راهبردی بر نوآوری مدل کسب‌وکار مثبت و معنادار نیست. لیکن ظرفیت جذب یک پیش‌شرط برای نوآوری مدل کسب‌وکار و انعطاف‌پذیری راهبردی محسوب شده و تأثیر معنادار و مثبت بر هریک از این‌ها دارد. ظرفیت جذب بالقوه کسب‌وکارهای کوچک و متوسط به طور کلی ظرفیت دسترسی، درونی‌سازی و بهره‌برداری از دانش جدید، نوآوری مدل کسب‌وکار و همچنین انعطاف‌پذیری آن‌ها را افزایش می‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of absorptive capacity and strategic flexibility on model innovation of small and medium businesses during the Corona virus pandemic

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Habibi 1
  • morteza rojuee 2
1 MA Graduated, Imam Reza International University (AS), Mashhad, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic has had significant effects on the performance of important businesses, especially small and medium businesses, which are of particular importance in the process of economic and social growth and development of countries and the special attention of policymakers. Exogenous crises have put the survival of small and medium businesses in doubt, and this causes fundamental disturbances in the economic systems of countries, so it is necessary for the managers of these types of businesses to develop and innovate their business model as a constant source. It is worth taking action to maintain, survive and grow your business in this critical situation. The importance of business model innovation in today's world is increasing, and top executives of global companies predict that its necessity will even exceed the importance of product and service innovation. Because business model innovation is a new criterion based on which pioneering companies try to create and provide more value to their customers, therefore the purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of absorption capacity and strategic flexibility on small and medium business model innovation with emphasis. It is about the effects of the pandemic virus, Covid-19.
Methodology: The present research is applied one in terms of purpose and descriptive correlation in terms of method. The statistical population is the small and medium-sized businesses of Mashhad in the number of 1300 companies, which were selected using the Cochran formula, a sample consisting of 297 companies, and the research questionnaire containing demographic questions and basic questions related to the measurement of potential absorption capacity. 6 items), realized absorptive capacity (7 items), strategic flexibility (6 items) and business model innovation (9 items) in the number of 350 questionnaires sent electronically to the senior managers of these companies for completion, and finally, 299 questionnaires were collected. Statistical analysis related to respondents' demographic information in terms of gender, age, education level, and company size were analyzed using SPSS software. The content validity of the questionnaire was checked and confirmed with the help of five experts and academic faculty members in the field of management, as well as two indicators, CVI and CVR. The validity of the structure was examined and confirmed using convergent validity (AVE index greater than 0.5) and divergent validity (Fornell-Larker matrix). Reliability was also confirmed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients and composite reliability (more than 0.7). Finally, the fit of the model with the help of coefficients of determination (R2) and the goodness of fit index (GOF) shows a moderate to a strong fit of the research model. Then, using SmartPLS software and structural equation modeling based on the least-squares approach, the research hypotheses were tested.
Results and Discussion: The results show that the potential absorptive capacity is directly related to the realized absorptive capacity with a path coefficient of 0.633 and a significance value of 20.019, as well as to business model innovation with a path coefficient of 0.234 and a significance value of 3.042, and on strategic flexibility with a path coefficient of 0.279 and a significance value of 3.863. It has a positive and significant effect. Also, the findings showed that strategic flexibility does not have a positive and significant effect on business model innovation. The findings of the research show that absorptive capacity is considered a dynamic ability as a prerequisite for business model innovation and strategic flexibility, which are two vital elements for gaining competitive advantage, and has a significant and positive effect on each of these.
Conclusion: The potential absorption capacity of small and medium-sized businesses generally increases their capacity to access, internalize, and exploit new knowledge, business model innovation, and flexibility. Therefore, it is suggested that managers of small and medium businesses focus on different aspects of their business model as well as its relationship with the business environment. Also, to control the conditions and the possibility of survival and continuation of the business, they should be aware of the fundamental changes in the market and the need for creative business platforms and management of conditions. Pay more attention to turbulence. Therefore, measures such as reviewing the business model through a bias toward digital transformation and identifying digital capabilities appropriate to turbulent conditions, as well as flexibility and changing the view of resources, and finding solutions to solve the future consequences of the Covid-19 epidemic crisis can be among the necessary suggestions and solutions. Managers of small and medium-sized businesses are considered critical in these critical situations, the reason being that in critical situations, senior business managers focus on making quick decisions in the shortest possible time, which creates small advisory circles and most decisions are based on knowledge. Potentially occurs.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Absorption capacity
  • Strategic flexibility
  • Business model innovation
  • Covid-19 virus
  • Small and medium businesses
  1. Adibi, M., Aghamohammadi, D., & Amani, M. (2021). Investigating the role of absorption capacity on designing business models mediated by innovation strategies in knowledge-based companies Thesis. ]in Persian[
  2. Agostino, M & Trivieri, F. (2019). Does trade credit affect technical efficiency? empirical evidence from Italian manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(2), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12410
  3. Ávila, M.M. (2022). Competitive advantage and knowledge absorptive capacity: the mediating role of innovative capability. J Knowl Econ, 13, 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00708-3
  4. Babkin A., Lipatnikov V., & Muraveva S. (2015). Assessing the impact of innovation strategies and R and D costs on the performance of IT companies. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.153
  5. Bamel, U.K., & Bamel, N. (2018). Organizational resources, KM process capability and strategic flexibility: a dynamic resource-capability perspective, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(7), 1555-1572. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0460
  6. Brozovic, D. (2018). Strategic flexibility: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12111
  7. Camisón, C., & Forés, B. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: new insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.022
  8. Clauss, T., Abebe, M., Tangpong, C., & Hock, M. (2019). Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2910381
  9. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Benitez, J., & Kou, G. (2017). Improving strategic flexibility with information technologies: insights for firm performance in an emerging economy, Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.26
  10. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  11. Dowell, G.W.S., & Muthulingam, S. (2017). Will firms go green if it pays? The impact of disruption, cost, and external factors on the adoption of environmental initiatives. Mgmt. J., 38, 1287-1304. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2603
  12. Ebrahimi, A., & Alodari, H. (2020). The role of balanced leadership and strategic flexibility in boosting business model innovation. Thesis. ]in Persian[
  13. Eisenhardt, K. M & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3C1105::AID-SMJ133%3E3.0.CO;2-E
  14. Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.11.002
  15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  16. Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2018). Business models and business model innovation: Between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.006
  17. Guoyou, Q., Yanhong, J., & Hailiang, Z. (2021). Is institutional pressure the mother of green innovation? Examining the moderating effect of absorptive capacity, Journal of Cleaner Production, 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123957
  18. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 227-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  19. Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K., & Marinova, S. (2019). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in emerging economies: The role of realized absorptive capacity and learning intent. International Business Review, 28(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.11.007
  20. Khanagha, S., Volberda, H., & Oshri, I. (2014). Business model renewal and ambidexterity: Structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a Cloud business model. Rand Management, 44(3), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12070
  21. Kotabe, M., Jiang, C. X., & Murray, J. Y. (2017). Examining the complementary effect of political networking capability with absorptive capacity on the innovative performance of emerging-market firms. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1131-1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314548226
  22. Latifi, M. A., Nikou, Sh., & Bouwman, H. (2021). Business model innovation and firm performance: Exploring causal mechanisms in SMEs, Technovation, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102274.
  23. Lew, Y. K., & Liu, Y. (2016). The contribution of inward FDI to Chinese regional innovation: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity on knowledge spillover. European Journal of International Management, 10(3), 284–313. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2016.076279
  24. Liu, F., Dutta, K & Park, K. (2020). From external knowledge to competitive advantage: absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the mediating role of labour productivity, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 32(3), 1436-1448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1787373
  25. Liu, H., Jiang, X., Zhang, J & Zhao, X. (2013). Strategic flexibility and international venturing by emerging market firms: The Moderating effects of institutional and relational factors. Journal of International Marketing, 21(2), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.12.0047
  26. Majid, A., Yasir, M., Yasir, M & Yousaf, Z. (2020). Network capability and strategic performance in SMEs: the role of strategic flexibility and organizational ambidexterity. Eurasian Bus Rev, 10(2), 519-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00165-7
  27. Mehdikhani, R & Valmohammadi, C. (2020). The impact of SMEs Characteristics on Financial Performance Growth via the Mediating role of Prospective Marketing Intelligence and Strategic Flexibility. Future study Management, 31(1), 1-15. https://jmfr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_16484.html?lang=en]in Persian[
  28. Meng, M., Lei, J., Jiao J & Tao, Q. (2020). How does strategic flexibility affect bricolage: The moderating role of environmental turbulence. PLoS ONE, 15(8), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238030
  29. Mirnezami, S.R & Rajabi, S. (2020). Estimating the impacts of COVID-19 on Iran economy: modelling seven scenarios. Journal of Sience and Technology Policy, 10(2), 8-18. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24767220.1399.10.2.1.4]in Persian[
  30. Miroshnychenko, I., Strobl, A., Matzler, K & De Massis, A. (2021). Absorptive capacity, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation: Empirical evidence from Italian SMEs. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 130(C), 670-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.015
  31. Mohsenin, Sh & Esfidani, Mo.R. (2014). Structural equations based on the partial least squares approach using Smart-PLS software. Mehraban Book Publishing Institute, 60-74. ]in Persian[
  32. Moradi, E., Jafari, S. M., Mohammadi, Z & Mirzaei, A. (2021). Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance, Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(4), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.01.003
  33. Müller, J.M. (2019). Business model innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: Strategies for industry 4.0 providers and users. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1127-1142. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0008
  34. Müller, J. M., Buliga, O & Voigt, K. I. (2021). The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models - A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises. European Management Journal, 39(3), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002
  35. OECD (2020). Start-ups in the time of COVID-19: Facing the challenges, seizing the opportunities. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions
  36. Ortega, E. L., Sánchez, D. C., Godinez, T. B & Herrer, S. M. (2016). Classification of micro, small and medium enterprises (M-SME) based on their available levels of knowledge. Technovation, 47, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.10.001
  37. Saebi, T., Lien, L & Foss, N. J. (2017). What drives business model adaptation? the impact of opportunities, threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 567-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.06.006
  38. Safari, M., Niknam, M & Mehrani, H. (2020). The impact of potential absorption capacity and knowledge capabilities on business model innovation with the mediating role of perceived absorption capacity and strategic flexibility. Thesis of Faculty of Management in Tehran University . ]in Persian[
  39. Sancho-Zamora, R., Hernández-Perlines, F., Peña-García, I & Gutiérrez-Broncano, S. (2022). The impact of absorptive capacity on innovation: the mediating role of organizational learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 842-858. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020842
  40. Schiavone, F., Paolone, F & Mancini, D. (2019). Business model innovation for urban smartization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.028
  41. Singh, D., Khamba, J.S & Nanda, T. (2017). Influence of technological innovation on performance of small manufacturing companies. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(7), 838-856. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2016-0035
  42. Spieth, P., Schneckenberg, D & Matzler, K. (2016). Exploring the linkage between business model (and) innovation and the strategy of the firm. Rand Management, 46(3), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12218
  43. Surya, B., Hernita, H., Salim, A., Suriani, S., Perwira, I., Yulia, Y., Ruslan, M & Yunus, K. (2022). Travel-Business Stagnation and SME Business Turbulence in the Tourism Sector in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(4), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042380
  44. Syriopoulos, K. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on entrepreneurship and SMES. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 26(2), 1-2. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:219512619
  45. Tayebi Abolhasani, A., Daneshvar deylami, M & Asadi Khanghah, S. (2020). The effect of knowledge capacity on strategic innovation, considering the moderating role of competitiveness and strategic flexibility (Case Study of INOTEX Companies). Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 11(42), 189-212. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286853.1399.11.42.12.3]in Persian[
  46. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y., et al. (2005). PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48, 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  47. Valinsky J. (2020). Business is booming for these 14 companies during the coronavirus pandemic. CNN Business. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/07/business/companies-thriving-coronavirus-pandemic
  48. Vlačić, E., Dabić, M., Daim, T & Vlajčić, D. (2019). Exploring the impact of the level of absorptive capacity in technology development firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138(1), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.018
  49. Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0503
  50. Yang, D., Wei, Z., Shi, H & Zhao, J. (2020). Market orientation, strategic flexibility and business model innovation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. 1(2), 211-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2018-0372
  51. Zahra, S. A & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  52. Zhang, Y., Gregory, M&Neely, A. (2016). Global engineering services: shedding light on network capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 42(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.03.006
  53. Zhao, X., Chang, T., Hwang, B., & Deng, X. (2017). Critical factors influencing business model innovation for sustainab buildings. Sustainability, 10(33), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010033
  54. Xiao, H., Yang, Zh., & Hu, Y. (2021). Influencing mechanism of strategic flexibility on corporate performance: the mediating role of business model innovation. Asia Pacific Business Review, 27(3), 470-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1896256